|Discovered by||Clyde W. Tombaugh|
|Discovery date||February 18, 1930|
|MPC designation||134340 Pluto|
(1989 Sep 05)
|Eccentricity||0.248 807 66|
|Synodic period||366.73 days|
|Average orbital speed||4.666 km/s|
|Longitude of ascending node||110.303 47°|
|Argument of perihelion||113.763 29°|
|Mean density||2.03 ± 0.06 g/cm3|
|Equatorial surface gravity|
|Escape velocity||1.229 km/s[f]|
|Equatorial rotation velocity||47.18 km/h|
|Axial tilt||119.591 ± 0.014° (to orbit)[g]|
|North pole right ascension||312.993°|
|North pole declination||6.163°|
|Albedo||0.49–0.66 (geometric, varies by 35%)|
|Apparent magnitude||13.65 to 16.3
(mean is 15.1)
|Absolute magnitude (H)||−0.7|
|Angular diameter||0.065″ to 0.115″[h]|
|Surface pressure||0.30 Pa (summer maximum)|
|Composition||nitrogen, methane, carbon monoxide|
Pluto, formal designation 134340 Pluto, is the second-most-massive known dwarf planet in the Solar System (after Eris) and the tenth-most-massive body observed directly orbiting the Sun. Originally classified as the ninth planet from the Sun, Pluto was recategorized as a dwarf planet and plutoid due to the discovery that it is one of several large bodies within the newly charted Kuiper belt.[i]
Like other members of the Kuiper belt, Pluto is composed primarily of rock and ice and is relatively small: approximately a fifth the mass of the Earth‘s Moon and a third its volume. It has an eccentric and highly inclined orbit that takes it from 30 to 49 AU (4.4–7.4 billion km) from the Sun. This causes Pluto to periodically come closer to the Sun than Neptune. As of 2011, it is 32.1 AU from the Sun.
From its discovery in 1930 until 2006, Pluto was classified as a planet. In the late 1970s, following the discovery of minor planet 2060 Chiron in the outer Solar System and the recognition of Pluto’s relatively low mass, its status as a major planet began to be questioned. In the late 20th and early 21st century, many objects similar to Pluto were discovered in the outer Solar System, notably the scattered disc object Eris in 2005, which is 27% more massive than Pluto. On August 24, 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) defined what it means to be a “planet” within the Solar System. This definition excluded Pluto as a planet and added it as a member of the new category “dwarf planet” along with Eris and Ceres. After the reclassification, Pluto was added to the list of minor planets and given the number 134340. A number of scientists hold that Pluto should continue to be classified as a planet, and that other dwarf planets should be added to the roster of planets along with Pluto.
Pluto has four known moons, the largest being Charon discovered in 1978, along with Nix and Hydra, discovered in 2005, and the provisionally named S/2011 P 1, discovered in 2011. Pluto and Charon are sometimes described as a binary system because the barycenter of their orbits does not lie within either body. However, the IAU has yet to formalise a definition for binary dwarf planets, and as such Charon is officially classified as a moon of Pluto.
In the 1840s, using Newtonian mechanics, Urbain Le Verrier predicted the position of the then-undiscovered planet Neptune after analysing perturbations in the orbit of Uranus. Subsequent observations of Neptune in the late 19th century caused astronomers to speculate that Uranus’ orbit was being disturbed by another planet besides Neptune. In 1906, Percival Lowell, a wealthy Bostonian who had founded the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona in 1894, started an extensive project in search of a possible ninth planet, which he termed “Planet X“. By 1909, Lowell and William H. Pickering had suggested several possible celestial coordinates for such a planet. Lowell and his observatory conducted his search until his death in 1916, but to no avail. Unknown to Lowell, on March 19, 1915, his observatory had captured two faint images of Pluto, but did not recognise them for what they were. Lowell was not the first to unknowingly photograph Pluto. There are sixteen known pre-discoveries, with the oldest being made by the Yerkes Observatory on August 20, 1909.
Due to a ten-year legal battle with Constance Lowell, Percival’s widow, who attempted to wrest the observatory’s million-dollar portion of his legacy for herself, the search for Planet X did not resume until 1929, when its director, Vesto Melvin Slipher, summarily handed the job of locating Planet X to Clyde Tombaugh, a 23-year-old Kansan who had just arrived at the Lowell Observatory after Slipher had been impressed by a sample of his astronomical drawings.
Tombaugh’s task was to systematically image the night sky in pairs of photographs taken two weeks apart, then examine each pair and determine whether any objects had shifted position. Using a machine called a blink comparator, he rapidly shifted back and forth between views of each of the plates to create the illusion of movement of any objects that had changed position or appearance between photographs. On February 18, 1930, after nearly a year of searching, Tombaugh discovered a possible moving object on photographic plates taken on January 23 and January 29 of that year. A lesser-quality photograph taken on January 21 helped confirm the movement. After the observatory obtained further confirmatory photographs, news of the discovery was telegraphed to the Harvard College Observatory on March 13, 1930.
The discovery made headlines across the globe. The Lowell Observatory, which had the right to name the new object, received over 1,000 suggestions from all over the world, ranging from Atlas to Zymal. Tombaugh urged Slipher to suggest a name for the new object quickly before someone else did. Constance Lowell proposed Zeus, then Percival and finally Constance. These suggestions were disregarded.
The name Pluto was proposed by Venetia Burney (1918–2009), an eleven-year-old schoolgirl in Oxford, England. Venetia was interested in classical mythology as well as astronomy, and considered the name, a name for the god of the underworld, appropriate for such a presumably dark and cold world. She suggested it in a conversation with her grandfather Falconer Madan, a former librarian at the University of Oxford‘s Bodleian Library. Madan passed the name to Professor Herbert Hall Turner, who then cabled it to colleagues in the United States.
The object was officially named on March 24, 1930. Each member of the Lowell Observatory was allowed to vote on a short-list of three: Minerva (which was already the name for an asteroid), Cronus (which had lost reputation through being proposed by the unpopular astronomer Thomas Jefferson Jackson See), and Pluto. Pluto received every vote. The name was announced on May 1, 1930. Upon the announcement, Madan gave Venetia five pounds (£5) (£234 as of 2012), as a reward.
It has been noted that the first two letters of Pluto are the initials of Percival Lowell, and Pluto’s astronomical symbol () is a monogram constructed from the letters ‘PL’. Pluto’s astrological symbol resembles that of Neptune (), but has a circle in place of the middle prong of the trident ().
The name was soon embraced by wider culture. In 1930, Walt Disney introduced for Mickey Mouse a canine companion, named Pluto apparently in the object’s honour, although Disney animator Ben Sharpsteen could not confirm why the name was given. In 1941, Glenn T. Seaborg named the newly created element plutonium after Pluto, in keeping with the tradition of naming elements after newly discovered planets, following uranium, which was named after Uranus, and neptunium, which was named after Neptune.
In Chinese, Japanese and Korean the name was translated as underworld king star (冥王星), as suggested by Houei Nojiri in 1930. Many other non-European languages use a transliteration of “Pluto” as their name for the object; some Indian languages use a form of Yama, the Guardian of Hell in Hindu mythology, such as the Gujarati Yamdev.
Demise of Planet X
|1931||1 Earth||Nicholson & Mayall|
|1948||0.1 (1/10) Earth||Kuiper|
|1976||0.01 (1/100) Earth||Cruikshank, Pilcher, & Morrison|
|1978||0.002 (1/500) Earth||Christy & Harrington|
Once found, Pluto’s faintness and lack of a resolvable disc cast doubt on the idea that it was Lowell’s Planet X. Estimates of Pluto’s mass were revised downward throughout the 20th century. In 1978, the discovery of Pluto’s moon Charon allowed the measurement of Pluto’s mass for the first time. Its mass, roughly 0.2% that of the Earth, was far too small to account for the discrepancies in the orbit of Uranus. Subsequent searches for an alternate Planet X, notably by Robert Sutton Harrington, failed. In 1992, Myles Standish used data from Voyager 2‘s 1989 flyby of Neptune, which had revised the planet’s total mass downward by 0.5%, to recalculate its gravitational effect on Uranus. With the new figures added in, the discrepancies, and with them the need for a Planet X, vanished. Today, the majority of scientists agree that Planet X, as Lowell defined it, does not exist. Lowell had made a prediction of Planet X’s position in 1915 that was fairly close to Pluto’s position at that time; Ernest W. Brown concluded almost immediately that this was a coincidence, a view still held today.
Orbit and rotation
Pluto’s orbital period is 248 Earth years. Its orbital characteristics are substantially different from those of the planets, which follow nearly circular orbits around the Sun close to a flat reference plane called the ecliptic. In contrast, Pluto’s orbit is highly inclined relative to the ecliptic (over 17°) and highly eccentric (elliptical). This high eccentricity means a small region of Pluto’s orbit lies nearer the Sun than Neptune‘s. The Pluto–Charon barycentre came to perihelion on September 5, 1989,[j] and was last closer to the Sun than Neptune between February 7, 1979 and February 11, 1999. Detailed calculations indicate that the previous such occurrence lasted only fourteen years, from July 11, 1735 to September 15, 1749, whereas between April 30, 1483 and July 23, 1503, it had also lasted 20 years. The durations of the relationship vary because of the varying speed of motion of Neptune along its orbit; the relationship between the orbits themselves varies much more slowly, as Neptune’s orbit precesses and otherwise evolves.
Although this repeating pattern may suggest a regular structure, in the long term Pluto’s orbit is in fact chaotic. While computer simulations can be used to predict its position for several million years (both forward and backward in time), after intervals longer than the Lyapunov time of 10–20 million years, calculations become speculative: Pluto’s tiny size makes it sensitive to unmeasurably small details of the Solar System, hard-to-predict factors that will gradually disrupt its orbit. Millions of years from now, Pluto may well be at aphelion, at perihelion or anywhere in between, with no way for us to predict which. This does not mean Pluto’s orbit itself is unstable, but its position on that orbit is impossible to determine so far ahead. Several resonances and other dynamical effects keep Pluto’s orbit stable, safe from planetary collision or scattering.
Relationship with Neptune
Despite Pluto’s orbit appearing to cross that of Neptune when viewed from directly above, the two objects’ orbits are aligned so that they can never collide or even approach closely. There are several reasons why.
At the simplest level, one can examine the two orbits and see that they do not intersect. When Pluto is closest to the Sun, and hence closest to Neptune’s orbit as viewed from above, it is also the farthest above Neptune’s path. Pluto’s orbit passes about 8 AU above that of Neptune, preventing a collision. Pluto’s ascending and descending nodes, the points at which its orbit crosses the ecliptic, are currently separated from Neptune’s by over 21°.
This alone is not enough to protect Pluto; perturbations from the planets (especially Neptune) could alter aspects of Pluto’s orbit (such as its orbital precession) over millions of years so that a collision could be possible. Some other mechanism or mechanisms must therefore be at work. The most significant of these is that Pluto lies in the 3:2 mean motion resonance with Neptune: for every three of Neptune’s orbits around the Sun, Pluto makes two. The two objects then return to their initial positions and the cycle repeats, each cycle lasting about 500 years. This pattern is configured so that, in each 500-year cycle, the first time Pluto is near perihelion Neptune is over 50° behind Pluto. By Pluto’s second perihelion, Neptune will have completed a further one and a half of its own orbits, and so will be a similar distance ahead of Pluto. Pluto and Neptune’s minimum separation is over 17 AU. Pluto comes closer to Uranus (11 AU) than it does to Neptune.
The 3:2 resonance between the two bodies is highly stable, and is preserved over millions of years. This prevents their orbits from changing relative to one another; the cycle always repeats in the same way, and so the two bodies can never pass near to each other. Thus, even if Pluto’s orbit were not highly inclined the two bodies could never collide.
Numerical studies have shown that over periods of millions of years, the general nature of the alignment between Pluto and Neptune’s orbits does not change. There are several other resonances and interactions that govern the details of their relative motion, and enhance Pluto’s stability. These arise principally from two additional mechanisms (besides the 3:2 mean motion resonance).
First, Pluto’s argument of perihelion, the angle between the point where it crosses the ecliptic and the point where it is closest to the Sun, librates around 90°. This means that when Pluto is nearest the Sun, it is at its farthest above the plane of the Solar System, preventing encounters with Neptune. This is a direct consequence of the Kozai mechanism, which relates the eccentricity of an orbit to its inclination to a larger perturbing body—in this case Neptune. Relative to Neptune, the amplitude of libration is 38°, and so the angular separation of Pluto’s perihelion to the orbit of Neptune is always greater than 52° (= 90°–38°). The closest such angular separation occurs every 10,000 years.
Second, the longitudes of ascending nodes of the two bodies—the points where they cross the ecliptic—are in near-resonance with the above libration. When the two longitudes are the same—that is, when one could draw a straight line through both nodes and the Sun—Pluto’s perihelion lies exactly at 90°, and it comes closest to the Sun at its peak above Neptune’s orbit. In other words, when Pluto most closely intersects the plane of Neptune’s orbit, it must be at its farthest beyond it. This is known as the 1:1 superresonance, and is controlled by all the Jovian planets.
To understand the nature of the libration, imagine a polar point of view, looking down on the ecliptic from a distant vantage point where the planets orbit counter-clockwise. After passing the ascending node, Pluto is interior to Neptune’s orbit and moving faster, approaching Neptune from behind. The strong gravitational pull between the two causes angular momentum to be transferred to Pluto, at Neptune’s expense. This moves Pluto into a slightly larger orbit, where it travels slightly slower, according to Kepler’s third law. As its orbit changes, this has the gradual effect of changing the pericentre and longitudes of Pluto (and, to a lesser degree, of Neptune). After many such repetitions, Pluto is sufficiently slowed, and Neptune sufficiently speeded up, that Neptune begins to catch Pluto at the opposite side of its orbit (near the opposing node to where we began). The process is then reversed, and Pluto loses angular momentum to Neptune, until Pluto is sufficiently speeded up that it begins to catch Neptune again at the original node. The whole process takes about 20,000 years to complete.
Pluto’s rotation period, its day, is equal to 6.39 Earth days. Like Uranus, Pluto rotates on its “side” on its orbital plane, with an axial tilt of 120°, and so its seasonal variation is extreme; at its solstices, one-fourth of its surface is in permanent daylight, while another fourth is in permanent darkness.
Appearance and surface
Pluto’s visual apparent magnitude averages 15.1, brightening to 13.65 at perihelion. To see it, a telescope is required; around 30 cm (12 in) aperture being desirable. It looks star-like and without a visible disk even in large telescopes, because its angular diameter is only 0.11″.
The earliest maps of Pluto, made in the late 1980s, were brightness maps created from close observations of eclipses by its largest moon, Charon. Observations were made of the change in the total average brightness of the Pluto–Charon system during the eclipses. For example, eclipsing a bright spot on Pluto makes a bigger total brightness change than eclipsing a dark spot. Computer processing of many such observations can be used to create a brightness map. This method can also track changes in brightness over time.
Current maps have been produced from images from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), which offers the highest resolution currently available, and show considerably more detail, resolving variations several hundred kilometres across, including polar regions and large bright spots. The maps are produced by complex computer processing, which find the best-fit projected maps for the few pixels of the Hubble images. The two cameras on the HST used for these maps are no longer in service, so these will likely remain the most detailed maps of Pluto until the 2015 flyby of New Horizons.
These maps, together with Pluto’s lightcurve and the periodic variations in its infrared spectra, reveal that Pluto’s surface is remarkably varied, with large changes in both brightness and colour. Pluto is one of the most contrastive bodies in the Solar System, with as much contrast as Saturn‘s moon Iapetus. The colour varies between charcoal black, dark orange and white: Buie et al. term it “significantly less red than Mars and much more similar to the hues seen on Io with a slightly more orange cast”.
Pluto’s surface has changed between 1994 and 2002-3: the northern polar region has brightened and the southern hemisphere darkened. Pluto’s overall redness has also increased substantially between 2000 and 2002. These rapid changes are probably related to seasonal condensation and sublimation of portions of Pluto’s atmosphere, amplified by Pluto’s extreme axial tilt and high orbital eccentricity.
Spectroscopic analysis of Pluto’s surface reveals it to be composed of more than 98 percent nitrogen ice, with traces of methane and carbon monoxide. The face of Pluto oriented toward Charon contains more methane ice, while the opposite face contains more nitrogen and carbon monoxide ice.
Observations by the Hubble Space Telescope place Pluto’s density at between 1.8 and 2.1 g/cm3, suggesting its internal composition consists of roughly 50–70 percent rock and 30–50 percent ice by mass. Because decay of radioactive minerals would eventually heat the ices enough for the rock to separate from them, scientists expect that Pluto’s internal structure is differentiated, with the rocky material having settled into a dense core surrounded by a mantle of ice. The diameter of the core should be around 1,700 km, 70% of Pluto’s diameter. It is possible that such heating continues today, creating a subsurface ocean layer of liquid water some 100 to 180 km thick at the core–mantle boundary. The DLR Institute of Planetary Research calculated that Pluto’s density-to-radius ratio lies in a transition zone, along with Neptune’s moon Triton, between icy satellites like the mid-sized moons of Uranus and Saturn, and rocky satellites such as Jupiter’s Europa.
Mass and size
Pluto’s mass is 1.31×1022 kg, less than 0.24 percent that of the Earth, while its diameter is 2,306 (+/- 20) km, or roughly 66% that of the Moon. Pluto’s atmosphere complicates determining its true solid size within a certain margin.
Astronomers, assuming Pluto to be Lowell’s Planet X, initially calculated its mass based on its presumed effect on Neptune and Uranus. In 1955 Pluto was calculated to be roughly the mass of the Earth, with further calculations in 1971 bringing the mass down to roughly that of Mars. In 1976, Dale Cruikshank, Carl Pilcher and David Morrison of the University of Hawaii calculated Pluto’s albedo for the first time, finding that it matched that for methane ice; this meant Pluto had to be exceptionally luminous for its size and therefore could not be more than 1 percent the mass of the Earth. Pluto’s albedo is 1.3–2.0 times greater than that of Earth.
The discovery of Pluto’s satellite Charon in 1978 enabled a determination of the mass of the Pluto–Charon system by application of Newton’s formulation of Kepler’s third law. Once Charon’s gravitational effect was measured, Pluto’s true mass could be determined. Observations of Pluto in occultation with Charon allowed scientists to establish Pluto’s diameter more accurately, while the invention of adaptive optics allowed them to determine its shape more accurately.
|1993||1195 (2390) km||Millis, et al. (If no haze)|
|1993||1180 (2360) km||Millis, et al. (surface & haze)|
|1994||1164 (2328) km||Young & Binzel|
|2006||1153 (2306) km||Buie, et al.|
|2007||1161 (2322) km||Young, Young, & Buie|
Among the objects of the Solar System, Pluto is much less massive than the terrestrial planets, and at less than 0.2 lunar masses, it is also less massive than seven moons: Ganymede, Titan, Callisto, Io, Earth’s Moon, Europa and Triton. Pluto is more than twice the diameter and a dozen times the mass of the dwarf planet Ceres, the largest object in the asteroid belt. It is less massive than the dwarf planet Eris, a trans-Neptunian object discovered in 2005. Given the error bars in the different size estimates, it is currently unknown whether Eris or Pluto has the larger diameter. Both Pluto and Eris are estimated to have solid-body diameters of about 2330 km. Determinations of Pluto’s size are complicated by its atmosphere, and possible hydrocarbon haze.
Pluto’s atmosphere consists of a thin envelope of nitrogen, methane, and carbon monoxide gases, which are derived from the ices of these substances on its surface. Its surface pressure ranges from 6.5 to 24 μbar. Pluto’s elongated orbit is predicted to have a major effect on its atmosphere: as Pluto moves away from the Sun, its atmosphere should gradually freeze out, and fall to the ground. When Pluto is closer to the Sun, the temperature of Pluto’s solid surface increases, causing the ices to sublimate into gas. This creates an anti-greenhouse effect; much as sweat cools the body as it evaporates from the surface of the skin, this sublimation cools the surface of Pluto. Scientists using the Submillimeter Array have recently discovered that Pluto’s temperature is about 43 K (−230 °C), 10 K colder than would otherwise be expected.
The presence of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, in Pluto’s atmosphere creates a temperature inversion, with average temperatures 36 K warmer 10 km above the surface. The lower atmosphere contains a higher concentration of methane than its upper atmosphere.
The first evidence of Pluto’s atmosphere was first suggested by N. Brosch and H. Mendelson of the Wise Observatory in Israel in 1985, and then definitively detected by the Kuiper Airborne Observatory in 1988, from observations of occultations of stars by Pluto. When an object with no atmosphere moves in front of a star, the star abruptly disappears; in the case of Pluto, the star dimmed out gradually. From the rate of dimming, the atmospheric pressure was determined to be 0.15 pascal, roughly 1/700,000 that of Earth.
In 2002, another occultation of a star by Pluto was observed and analysed by teams led by Bruno Sicardy of the Paris Observatory, James L. Elliot of MIT, and Jay Pasachoff of Williams College. Surprisingly, the atmospheric pressure was estimated to be 0.3 pascal, even though Pluto was farther from the Sun than in 1988 and thus should have been colder and had a more rarefied atmosphere. One explanation for the discrepancy is that in 1987 the south pole of Pluto came out of shadow for the first time in 120 years, causing extra nitrogen to sublimate from the polar cap. It will take decades for the excess nitrogen to condense out of the atmosphere as it freezes onto the north pole’s now permanently dark ice cap. Spikes in the data from the same study revealed what may be the first evidence of wind in Pluto’s atmosphere. Another stellar occultation was observed by the MIT-Williams College team of James Elliot, Jay Pasachoff, and a Southwest Research Institute team led by Leslie Young on June 12, 2006 from sites in Australia.
In October 2006, Dale Cruikshank of NASA/Ames Research Center (a New Horizons co-investigator) and his colleagues announced the spectroscopic discovery of ethane on Pluto’s surface. This ethane is produced from the photolysis or radiolysis (i.e., the chemical conversion driven by sunlight and charged particles) of frozen methane on Pluto’s surface and suspended in its atmosphere.
Pluto has four known natural satellites: Charon, first identified in 1978 by astronomer James Christy; Nix and Hydra, both discovered in 2005, and S/2011 P 1 (provisional name, also known as P4), identified by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2011.
The Plutonian moons are unusually close to Pluto, compared to other observed systems. Moons could potentially orbit Pluto up to 53% (or 69%, if retrograde) of the Hill sphere radius, the stable gravitational zone of Pluto’s influence. For example, Psamathe orbits Neptune at 40% of the Hill radius. In the case of Pluto, only the inner 3% of the zone is known to be occupied by satellites. In the discoverers’ terms, the Plutonian system appears to be “highly compact and largely empty”, although others have pointed out the possibility of additional objects, including a small ring system.
The Pluto–Charon system is noteworthy for being one of the Solar System’s few binary systems, defined as those whose barycentre lies above the primary’s surface (617 Patroclus is a smaller example, the Sun and Jupiter the only larger one). This and the large size of Charon relative to Pluto has led some astronomers to call it a dwarf double planet. The system is also unusual among planetary systems in that each is tidally locked to the other: Charon always presents the same face to Pluto, and Pluto always presents the same face to Charon: from any position on either body, the other is always at the same position in the sky, or always obscured. Because of this, the rotation period of each is equal to the time it takes the entire system to rotate around its common centre of gravity. Just as Pluto revolves on its side relative to the orbital plane, so the Pluto–Charon system does also. In 2007, observations by the Gemini Observatory of patches of ammonia hydrates and water crystals on the surface of Charon suggested the presence of active cryo-geysers.
Nix and Hydra
Two additional moons of Pluto were imaged by astronomers working with the Hubble Space Telescope on May 15, 2005, and received provisional designations of S/2005 P 1 and S/2005 P 2. The International Astronomical Union officially named Pluto’s newest moons Nix (or Pluto II, the inner of the two moons, formerly P 2) and Hydra (Pluto III, the outer moon, formerly P 1), on June 21, 2006.
These small moons orbit Pluto at approximately two and three times the distance of Charon: Nix at 48,700 kilometres and Hydra at 64,800 kilometres from the barycenter of the system. They have nearly circular prograde orbits in the same orbital plane as Charon.
Observations of Nix and Hydra to determine individual characteristics are ongoing. Hydra is sometimes brighter than Nix, suggesting either that it is larger or that different parts of its surface may vary in brightness. Sizes are estimated from albedos. The moons’ spectral similarity to Charon suggests a 35% albedo similar to Charon’s; this value results in diameter estimates of 46 kilometres for Nix and 61 kilometres for the brighter Hydra. Upper limits on their diameters can be estimated by assuming the 4% albedo of the darkest Kuiper Belt objects; these bounds are 137 ± 11 km and 167 ± 10 km, respectively. At the larger end of this range, the inferred masses are less than 0.3% that of Charon, or 0.03% of Pluto’s.
The discovery of the two small moons suggests that Pluto may possess a variable ring system. Small body impacts can create debris that can form into planetary rings. Data from a deep optical survey by the Advanced Camera for Surveys on the Hubble Space Telescope suggest that no ring system is present. If such a system exists, it is either tenuous like the rings of Jupiter or is tightly confined to less than 1,000 km in width.
Similar conclusions have been made from occultation studies. In imaging the Plutonian system, observations from Hubble placed limits on any additional moons. With 90% confidence, no additional moons larger than 12 km (or a maximum of 37 km with an albedo of 0.041) exist beyond the glare of Pluto 5 arcseconds from the dwarf planet. This assumes a Charon-like albedo of 0.38; at a 50% confidence level the limit is 8 kilometres.
S/2011 P 1
On July 20, 2011 Mark Showalter of the SETI Institute announced the discovery of a fourth moon of Pluto, provisionally named S/2011 P 1 or P4. It was noticed by NASA‘s Hubble Space Telescope during a survey searching for rings around the dwarf planet. It has an estimated diameter of 13 to 34 km and is located between the orbits of Nix and Hydra.
S/2011 P 1 was first seen in a photo taken with Hubble’s Wide Field Camera 3 on June 28. It was confirmed in subsequent Hubble pictures taken on July 3 and July 18.
Nix and Hydra are very close to (but not in) 4:1 and 6:1 mean motion orbital resonances with Charon. S/2011 P 1 fits neatly into this arrangement with a near 5:1 resonance with Charon. Determining how close any of these near integer orbital period ratios might actually be to a true resonance requires accurate knowledge of the satellites’ precessions.
|Orbital radius (km)
|Orbital period (d)|
|S/2011 P 1||2011||13–34||~59,000||32.1|
Mass of Nix and Hydra assumes icy/porous density of 1.0 g/cm3
Pluto’s origin and identity had long puzzled astronomers. One early hypothesis was that Pluto was an escaped moon of Neptune, knocked out of orbit by its largest current moon, Triton. This notion has been heavily criticised because Pluto never comes near Neptune in its orbit.
Pluto’s true place in the Solar System began to reveal itself only in 1992, when astronomers began to find small icy objects beyond Neptune that were similar to Pluto not only in orbit but also in size and composition. This trans-Neptunian population is believed to be the source of many short-period comets. Astronomers now believe Pluto to be the largest[i] member of the Kuiper belt, a somewhat stable ring of objects located between 30 and 50 AU from the Sun. Like other Kuiper-belt objects (KBOs), Pluto shares features with comets; for example, the solar wind is gradually blowing Pluto’s surface into space, in the manner of a comet. If Pluto were placed as near to the Sun as Earth, it would develop a tail, as comets do.
Though Pluto is the largest of the Kuiper belt objects discovered so far, Neptune’s moon Triton, which is slightly larger than Pluto, is similar to it both geologically and atmospherically, and is believed to be a captured Kuiper belt object. Eris (see below) is also larger than Pluto but is not strictly considered a member of the Kuiper belt population. Rather, it is considered a member of a linked population called the scattered disc.
Like other members of the Kuiper belt, Pluto is thought to be a residual planetesimal; a component of the original protoplanetary disc around the Sun that failed to fully coalesce into a full-fledged planet. Most astronomers agree that Pluto owes its current position to a sudden migration undergone by Neptune early in the Solar System’s formation. As Neptune migrated outward, it approached the objects in the proto-Kuiper belt, setting one in orbit around itself, which became its moon Triton, locking others into resonances and knocking others into chaotic orbits. The objects in the scattered disc, a dynamically unstable region overlapping the Kuiper belt, are believed to have been placed in their current positions by interactions with Neptune’s migrating resonances. A 2004 computer model by Alessandro Morbidelli of the Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur in Nice suggested that the migration of Neptune into the Kuiper belt may have been triggered by the formation of a 1:2 resonance between Jupiter and Saturn, which created a gravitational push that propelled both Uranus and Neptune into higher orbits and caused them to switch places, ultimately doubling Neptune’s distance from the Sun. The resultant expulsion of objects from the proto-Kuiper belt could also explain the Late Heavy Bombardment 600 million years after the Solar System’s formation and the origin of Jupiter’s Trojan asteroids. It is possible that Pluto had a near-circular orbit about 33 AU from the Sun before Neptune’s migration perturbed it into a resonant capture. The Nice model requires that there were about a thousand Pluto-sized bodies in the original planetesimal disk; these may have included the bodies which became Triton and Eris.
Pluto presents significant challenges for spacecraft because of its small mass and great distance from Earth. Voyager 1 could have visited Pluto, but controllers opted instead for a close flyby of Saturn’s moon Titan, resulting in a trajectory incompatible with a Pluto flyby. Voyager 2 never had a plausible trajectory for reaching Pluto. No serious attempt to explore Pluto by spacecraft occurred until the last decade of the 20th century. In August 1992, JPL scientist Robert Staehle telephoned Pluto’s discoverer, Clyde Tombaugh, requesting permission to visit his planet. “I told him he was welcome to it,” Tombaugh later remembered, “though he’s got to go one long, cold trip.” Despite this early momentum, in 2000, NASA cancelled the Pluto Kuiper Express mission, citing increasing costs and launch vehicle delays.
After an intense political battle, a revised mission to Pluto, dubbed New Horizons, was granted funding from the US government in 2003. New Horizons was launched successfully on January 19, 2006. The mission leader, S. Alan Stern, confirmed that some of the ashes of Clyde Tombaugh, who died in 1997, had been placed aboard the spacecraft.
In early 2007 the craft made use of a gravity assist from Jupiter. Its closest approach to Pluto will be on July 14, 2015; scientific observations of Pluto will begin 5 months before closest approach and will continue for at least a month after the encounter. New Horizons captured its first (distant) images of Pluto in late September 2006, during a test of the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI). The images, taken from a distance of approximately 4.2 billion kilometres, confirm the spacecraft’s ability to track distant targets, critical for maneuvering toward Pluto and other Kuiper Belt objects.
New Horizons will use a remote sensing package that includes imaging instruments and a radio science investigation tool, as well as spectroscopic and other experiments, to characterise the global geology and morphology of Pluto and its moon Charon, map their surface composition and analyse Pluto’s neutral atmosphere and its escape rate. New Horizons will also photograph the surfaces of Pluto and Charon.
The discovery of Pluto’s two small moons, Nix and Hydra, may present unforeseen challenges for the probe. Debris from collisions between Kuiper belt objects and the smaller moons, with their relatively low escape velocities, may produce a tenuous dusty ring. Were New Horizons to fly through such a ring system, there would be an increased potential for micrometeoroid damage that could disable the probe.
A Pluto orbiter/lander/sample return mission using the MITEE nuclear engine was proposed in 2003. The plan included a twelve year trip to Pluto from Earth, then mapping from orbit, multiple landings, warm water probe, and possible in situ propellant production for another twelve year trip back to Earth with samples. Power and propulsion would come from the bi-modal nuclear reactor system.
After Pluto’s place within the Kuiper belt was determined, its official status as a planet became controversial, with many questioning whether Pluto should be considered together with or separately from its surrounding population.
Museum and planetarium directors occasionally created controversy by omitting Pluto from planetary models of the Solar System. The Hayden Planetarium reopened after renovation in 2000 with a model of only eight planets. The controversy made headlines at the time.
In 2002, the KBO 50000 Quaoar was discovered, with a diameter then thought to be roughly 1280 kilometres, about half that of Pluto. In 2004, the discoverers of 90377 Sedna placed an upper limit of 1800 km on its diameter, nearer to Pluto’s diameter of 2320 km, although Sedna’s diameter was revised downward to less than 1600 km by 2007. Just as Ceres, Pallas, Juno and Vesta eventually lost their planet status after the discovery of many other asteroids, so, it was argued, Pluto should be reclassified as one of the Kuiper belt objects.
On July 29, 2005, the discovery of a new Trans-Neptunian object was announced. Named Eris, it is now known to be approximately the same size as Pluto. This was the largest object discovered in the Solar System since Triton in 1846. Its discoverers and the press initially called it the tenth planet, although there was no official consensus at the time on whether to call it a planet. Others in the astronomical community considered the discovery the strongest argument for reclassifying Pluto as a minor planet.
2006: IAU classification
The debate came to a head in 2006 with an IAU resolution that created an official definition for the term “planet”. According to this resolution, there are three main conditions for an object to be considered a ‘planet’:
- The object must be in orbit around the Sun.
- The object must be massive enough to be a sphere by its own gravitational force. More specifically, its own gravity should pull it into a shape of hydrostatic equilibrium.
- It must have cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
Pluto fails to meet the third condition, since its mass is only 0.07 times that of the mass of the other objects in its orbit (Earth’s mass, by contrast, is 1.7 million times the remaining mass in its own orbit). The IAU further resolved that Pluto be classified in the simultaneously created dwarf planet category, and that it act as the prototype for the plutoid category of trans-Neptunian objects, in which it would be separately, but concurrently, classified.
On September 13, 2006, the IAU included Pluto, Eris, and the Eridian moon Dysnomia in their Minor Planet Catalogue, giving them the official minor planet designations “(134340) Pluto”, “(136199) Eris”, and “(136199) Eris I Dysnomia”. If Pluto had been given a minor planet name upon its discovery, the number would have been about 1,164 rather than 134,340.
There has been some resistance within the astronomical community toward the reclassification. Alan Stern, principal investigator with NASA‘s New Horizons mission to Pluto, has publicly derided the IAU resolution, stating that “the definition stinks, for technical reasons.” Stern’s contention is that by the terms of the new definition Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and Neptune, all of which share their orbits with asteroids, would be excluded. His other claim is that because less than five percent of astronomers voted for it, the decision was not representative of the entire astronomical community. Marc W. Buie of the Lowell observatory has voiced his opinion on the new definition on his website and is one of the petitioners against the definition. Others have supported the IAU. Mike Brown, the astronomer who discovered Eris, said “through this whole crazy circus-like procedure, somehow the right answer was stumbled on. It’s been a long time coming. Science is self-correcting eventually, even when strong emotions are involved.”
Researchers on both sides of the debate gathered on August 14–16, 2008, at The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory for a conference that included back-to-back talks on the current IAU definition of a planet. Entitled “The Great Planet Debate”, the conference published a post-conference press release indicating that scientists could not come to a consensus about the definition of a planet. Just before the conference, on June 11, 2008, the IAU announced in a press release that the term “plutoid” would henceforth be used to describe Pluto and other objects similar to Pluto which have an orbital semimajor axis greater than that of Neptune and enough mass to be of near-spherical shape.
Reception to the IAU decision was mixed. While some accepted the reclassification, others seek to overturn the decision with online petitions urging the IAU to consider reinstatement. A resolution introduced by some members of the California State Assembly light-heartedly denounces the IAU for “scientific heresy”, among other crimes. The U.S. state of New Mexico‘s House of Representatives passed a resolution in honor of Tombaugh, a longtime resident of that state, which declared that Pluto will always be considered a planet while in New Mexican skies and that March 13, 2007 was Pluto Planet Day. The Illinois State Senate passed a similar resolution in 2009, on the basis that Clyde Tombaugh, the discoverer of Pluto, was born in Illinois. The resolution asserted that Pluto was “unfairly downgraded to a ‘dwarf’ planet” by the IAU.
Some members of the public have also rejected the change, citing the disagreement within the scientific community on the issue, or for sentimental reasons, maintaining that they have always known Pluto as a planet and will continue to do so regardless of the IAU decision.
|Book: Dwarf Planets Of The Solar System & Their Satellites|
|Wikipedia books are collections of articles that can be downloaded or ordered in print.|
- ^ The HST observations were made in two wavelengths, which is insufficient to directly make a true-colour image. The surface maps at each wavelength limit the shape of the spectrum that could be produced by the materials that are potentially on Pluto’s surface. These spectra, generated for each resolved point on the surface, are then converted to the RGB colour values seen here. See Buie et al, 2010.
- ^ In US dictionary transcription, US dict: plōō′·tō. From the Latin: Plūto
- ^ Surface area derived from the radius r: .
- ^ Volume v derived from the radius r: .
- ^ Surface gravity derived from the mass m, the gravitational constant G and the radius r: .
- ^ Escape velocity derived from the mass m, the gravitational constant G and the radius r: √.
- ^ Based on the orientation of Charon’s orbit, which is assumed the same as Pluto’s spin axis due to the mutual tidal locking.
- ^ Based on geometry of minimum and maximum distance from Earth and Pluto radius in the factsheet
- ^ a b The dwarf planet Eris is roughly the same size as Pluto, about 2330 km, but 28% more massive. Eris is a scattered-disc object, often considered a distinct population from Kuiper-belt objects like Pluto; Pluto is the largest body in the Kuiper belt if the scattered objects are excluded.
- ^ The discovery of Charon in 1978 allowed astronomers to accurately calculate the mass of the Plutonian system. But it did not indicate the two bodies’ individual masses, which could only be estimated, until the discovery of Pluto’s outer moons in late 2005. As a result, since Pluto came to perihelion in 1989, most Pluto perihelion date estimates are based on the Pluto–Charon barycentre. Charon came to perihelion 1989-Sep-04. The Pluto–Charon barycenter came to perihelion 1989-Sep-05. Pluto came to perihelion 1989-Sep-08.
- ^ a b “Horizon Online Ephemeris System for Pluto Barycenter”. JPL Horizons On-Line Ephemeris System @ Solar System Dynamics Group. http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi?find_body=1&body_group=mb&sstr=9. Retrieved 2011-01-16. (set Observer Location to @sun to place the observer at the center of the sun)
- ^ Seligman, Courtney. “Rotation Period and Day Length”. http://cseligman.com/text/sky/rotationvsday.htm. Retrieved 2009-08-13.
- ^ Williams, J G. “Keplerian Elements for Approximate Positions of the Major Planets”. http://iau-comm4.jpl.nasa.gov/keplerformulae/kepform.pdf. Retrieved 2011-01-12.
- ^ a b c d e f g Buie, Marc W.; Grundy, William M.; Young, Eliot F.; Young, Leslie A.; Stern, S. Alan (2006). “Orbits and Photometry of Pluto’s Satellites: Charon, S/2005 P1, and S/2005 P2″. The Astronomical Journal 132 (1): 290. arXiv:astro-ph/0512491. Bibcode 2006AJ….132..290B. doi:10.1086/504422. http://iopscience.iop.org/1538-3881/132/1/290/fulltext.
- ^ a b c Young, Eliot F.; Young, L. A.; Buie, M.; Young; Buie (2007). “Pluto’s Radius”. American Astronomical Society, DPS meeting No. 39, #62.05; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society 39: 541. Bibcode 2007DPS….39.6205Y.
- ^ a b Seidelmann, P. K.; Archinal, B. A.; A’hearn, M. F. et al (2007). “Report of the IAU/IAG Working Group on cartographic coordinates and rotational elements: 2006″. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 98 (3): 155–180. Bibcode 2007CeMDA..98..155S. doi:10.1007/s10569-007-9072-y.
- ^ Calvin J. Hamilton (2006-02-12). “Dwarf Planet Pluto”. Views of the Solar System. http://www.solarviews.com/eng/pluto.htm. Retrieved 2007-01-10.
- ^ a b c d e f D. R. Williams (September 7, 2006). “Pluto Fact Sheet”. NASA. http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/plutofact.html. Retrieved 2007-03-24.
- ^ “AstDys (134340) Pluto Ephemerides”. Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Italy. http://hamilton.dm.unipi.it/astdys/index.php?pc=184.108.40.206&n=134340&oc=500&y0=1870&m0=2&d0=9&h0=0&mi0=0&y1=1870&m1=3&d1=20&h1=0&mi1=0&ti=1.0&tiu=days. Retrieved 2010-06-27.
- ^ “JPL Small-Body Database Browser: 134340 Pluto”. http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=Pluto. Retrieved 2008-06-12.
- ^ “Pluto has carbon monoxide in its atmosphere”. Physorg.com. April 19, 2011. http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-04-pluto-carbon-monoxide-atmosphere.html. Retrieved 2011-11-22.
- ^ “(134340) Pluto”. Hamilton.dm.unipi.it. AstDyS. http://hamilton.dm.unipi.it/astdys/index.php?pc=220.127.116.11&n=134340. Retrieved 2011-11-22.
- ^ Ian Ridpath (December 1978). “Pluto—Planet or Imposter?”. Astronomy: 6–11. http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/ianridpath/Pluto.pdf.
- ^ “Astronomers Measure Mass of Largest Dwarf Planet”. hubblesite. 2007. http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2007/24/full/. Retrieved 2007-11-03.
- ^ A. Akwagyiram (2005-08-02). “Farewell Pluto?”. BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4737647.stm. Retrieved 2006-03-05.
- ^ T. B. Spahr (2006-09-07). “MPEC 2006-R19 : Editorial Notice”. Minor Planet Center. http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/mpec/K06/K06R19.html. Retrieved 2011-07-05.
- ^ D. Shiga (2006-09-07). “Pluto added to official “minor planet” list”. NewScientist. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn10028-pluto-added-to-official-minor-planet-list.html. Retrieved 2006-09-08.
- ^ Richard Gray (2008-08-10). “Pluto should get back planet status, say astronomers”. The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/3349184/Pluto-should-get-back-planet-status-say-astronomers.html. Retrieved 2008-08-09.
- ^ Adam Gorwyn, Alan Stern: ‘A Chihuahua is still a dog, and Pluto is still a planet’. EarthSky interview, 2010 Feb 18
- ^ Sicardy, Bruno, Beisker, W. et al (2006). “Observing Two Pluto Stellar Approaches In 2006: Results On Pluto’s Atmosphere And Detection Of Hydra”. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society 38: 542. Bibcode 2006DPS….38.3106S.
- ^ “NASA’s Hubble Discovers Another Moon Around Pluto”. NASA. 2011-07-20. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/pluto-moon.html. Retrieved 2011-11-22.
- ^ C.B. Olkin, L.H. Wasserman, O.G. Franz (2003). “The mass ratio of Charon to Pluto from Hubble Space Telescope astrometry with the fine guidance sensors”. Icarus 164 (1): 254–259. Bibcode 2003Icar..164..254O. doi:10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00136-2. http://www.as.utexas.edu/~fritz/astrometry/Papers_in_pdf/%7BOlk03%7DPlutoCharon.pdf. Retrieved 2007-03-13.
- ^ “Pluto and the Developing Landscape of Our Solar System” International Astronomical Union. Retrieved on October 27, 2010.
- ^ Croswell 1997, p. 43.
- ^ Tombaugh, C. W. (1946). “The Search for the Ninth Planet, Pluto”. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Leaflets 5: 73–80. Bibcode 1946ASPL….5…73T.
- ^ a b c W. G. Hoyt (1976). “W. H. Pickering’s Planetary Predictions and the Discovery of Pluto”. Isis 67 (4): 551–564. doi:10.1086/351668. JSTOR 230561.
- ^ Littman, Mark (1990). Planets Beyond: Discovering the Outer Solar System. Wiley. p. 70. ISBN 0-471-51053-X.
- ^ Buchwald, Greg; Dimario, Michael; Wild, Walter (2000). “Pluto is Discovered Back in Time”. Amateur—Professional Partnerships in Astronomy (San Francisco: San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific) 220: 335. Bibcode 2000ASPC..220..355B. ISBN 1-58381-052-8.
- ^ a b Croswell 1997, p. 50.
- ^ Croswell 1997, p. 52.
- ^ a b J. Rao (March 11, 2005). “Finding Pluto: Tough Task, Even 75 Years Later”. Space.com. http://www.space.com/spacewatch/050311_pluto_guide.html. Retrieved 2006-09-08.
- ^ Mager, Brad. “The Search Continues”. Pluto: The Discovery of Planet X. http://www.discoveryofpluto.com/pluto05.html. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ a b c P. Rincon (2006-01-13). “The girl who named a planet”. Pluto: The Discovery of Planet X (BBC News). http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4596246.stm. Retrieved 2007-04-12.
- ^ Claxton, K. M.. “The Planet ‘Pluto’”. Parents’ Union School Diamond Jubilee Magazine, 1891–1951 (Ambleside: PUS, 1951), p. 30–32. http://fredpratt.tripod.com/PR/pluto.html. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ “The Trans-Neptunian Body: Decision to call it Pluto”. The Times: p. 15. May 27, 1930.
- ^ “Name Pluto Given to Body Believed to Be Planet X”. The New York Times. Associated Press (New York City): p. 1. May 25, 1930. ISSN 1556067. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F60F14FC3D55147A93C7AB178ED85F448385F9&scp=1&sq=Name%20given%20to%20body%20planet%20X&st=cse. “Pluto, the title of the Roman gods of the region of darkness, was announced tonight at Lowell Observatory here as the name chosen for the recently discovered trans-Neptunian body, which is believed to be the long-sought Planet X.”
- ^ Croswell 1997, pp. 54–55.
- ^ UK CPI inflation numbers based on data available from Lawrence H. Officer (2010) “What Were the UK Earnings and Prices Then?” MeasuringWorth.
- ^ “NASA’s Solar System Exploration: Multimedia: Gallery: Pluto’s Symbol”. NASA. http://sse.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/display.cfm?IM_ID=263. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ Heinrichs, Allison M. (2006). “Dwarfed by comparison”. Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_467650.html. Retrieved 2007-03-26. [dead link]
- ^ Clark, David L.; Hobart, David E. (2000). “Reflections on the Legacy of a Legend”. http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/pubs/00818011.pdf. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ a b “Planetary Linguistics”. Archived from the original on December 17, 2007. http://web.archive.org/web/20071217070734/http://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/nineplanets/nineplanets/days.html. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- ^ ‘Bathrobe’. “Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto in Chinese, Japanese, and Vietnamese”. cjvlang.com. http://www.cjvlang.com/Dow/UrNepPl.html. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ Renshaw, Steve; Ihara, Saori (2000). “A Tribute to Houei Nojiri”. http://www2.gol.com/users/stever/nojiri.htm. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ Royal Astronomical Society (1931). “The Discovery of Pluto”. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 91: 380–385. Bibcode 1931MNRAS..91..380..
- ^ Nicholson, Seth B.; Mayall, Nicholas U. (December 1930). “The Probable Value of the Mass of Pluto”. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 42 (250): 350. Bibcode 1930PASP…42..350N. doi:10.1086/124071.
- ^ Nicholson, Seth B.; Mayall, Nicholas U. (January 1931). “Positions, Orbit, and Mass of Pluto”. Astrophysical Journal 73: 1. Bibcode 1931ApJ….73….1N. doi:10.1086/143288.
- ^ Kuiper, Gerard P. (1950). “The Diameter of Pluto”. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 62 (366): 133–137. Bibcode 1950PASP…62..133K. doi:10.1086/126255.
- ^ a b c Croswell 1997, p. 57.
- ^ Christy, James W.; Harrington, Robert Sutton (1978). “The Satellite of Pluto”. Astronomical Journal 83 (8): 1005–1008. Bibcode 1978AJ…..83.1005C. doi:10.1086/112284.
- ^ Seidelmann, P. K.; Harrington, Robert Sutton (1988). “Planet X – The current status”. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 43: 55–68. Bibcode 1987CeMec..43…55S. doi:10.1007/BF01234554. http://www.springerlink.com/content/r42h4u7232t724uq/. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ a b Standish, Myles (1993). “Planet X—No dynamical evidence in the optical observations”. Astronomical Journal 105 (5): 200–2006. Bibcode 1993AJ….105.2000S. doi:10.1086/116575.
- ^ Standage, Tom (2000). The Neptune File. Penguin. p. 168. ISBN 0-8027-1363-7.
- ^ “History I: The Lowell Observatory in 20th century Astronomy”. The Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 1994-06-28. http://www.phys-astro.sonoma.edu/people/faculty/tenn/asphistory/1994.html. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ “Pluto to become most distant planet”. JPL/NASA. 1999-01-28. http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/99/pluto990209.html. Retrieved 2011-01-16.
- ^ Gerald Jay Sussman; Jack Wisdom (1988). “Numerical evidence that the motion of Pluto is chaotic”. Science 241 (4864): 433–437. Bibcode 1988Sci…241..433S. doi:10.1126/science.241.4864.433. PMID 17792606.
- ^ Jack Wisdom; Matthew Holman (1991). “Symplectic maps for the n-body problem”. Astronomical Journal 102: 1528–1538. Bibcode 1991AJ….102.1528W. doi:10.1086/115978.
- ^ a b c d X.-S. Wan, T.-Y. Huang, and K. A. Innanen (2001). “The 1 : 1 Superresonance in Pluto’s Motion”. The Astronomical Journal 121 (2): 1155–1162. Bibcode 2001AJ….121.1155W. doi:10.1086/318733.
- ^ Hunter, Maxwell W. (2004). “Unmanned scientific exploration throughout the Solar System”. Space Science Reviews 6 (5): 501. Bibcode 1967SSRv….6..601H. doi:10.1007/BF00168793.
- ^ a b c d Malhotra, Renu (1997). “Pluto’s Orbit”. http://www.nineplanets.org/plutodyn.html. Retrieved 2007-03-26.
- ^ Williams, David R. (17 November 2010). “Planetary Fact Sheet — Metric”. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ a b c Hannes Alfvén and Gustaf Arrhenius (1976). “SP-345 Evolution of the Solar System”. http://history.nasa.gov/SP-345/ch8.htm. Retrieved 2007-03-28.
- ^ a b J. G. Williams; G. S. Benson (1971). “Resonances in the Neptune-Pluto System”. Astronomical Journal 76: 167. Bibcode 1971AJ…..76..167W. doi:10.1086/111100.
- ^ a b Pluto and Charon: The Odd Couple. 2007. pp. 401–408. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5544-7.
- ^ a b U. Oregon Ast. 121 Lecture notes, Pluto Orientation diagram
- ^ “Space Probe Heads To Pluto—Finally”. CBS News. 2006-01-19. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/01/19/tech/main1219891.shtml. Retrieved 2007-04-14.
- ^ “This month Pluto’s apparent magnitude is m=14.1. Could we see it with an 11″ reflector of focal length 3400 mm?”. Singapore Science Centre. 2002. Archived from the original on November 11, 2005. http://web.archive.org/web/20051111151435/http://www.science.edu.sg/ssc/detailed.jsp?artid=1950&type=6&root=6&parent=6&cat=66. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ Young, E. F.; Binzel, R. P.; Crane, K. (2000). “A Two-Color Map of Pluto Based on Mutual Event Lightcurves”. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society 32: 1083. Bibcode 2000DPS….32.4601Y.
- ^ Buie, M. W.; Tholen, D. J.; Horne, K. (1992). “Albedo maps of Pluto and Charon: Initial mutual event results”. Icarus 97 (2): 221–227. Bibcode 1992Icar…97..211B. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90129-U. http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~buie/biblio/pub015.html.
- ^ a b Buie, Marc W.. “Pluto map information”. http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~buie/pluto/hrcmap.html. Retrieved February 10, 2010.
- ^ a b Buie, Marc W.; Grundy, William M.; Young, Eliot F.; Young, Leslie A.; Stern, S. Alan (2010). “Pluto and Charon with the Hubble Space Telescope: II. Resolving changes on Pluto’s surface and a map for Charon”. Astronomical Journal 139 (3): 1128–1143. Bibcode 2010AJ….139.1128B. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/1128. http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~buie/biblio/pub073.html.
- ^ a b Buie, Marc W.. “How the Pluto maps were made”. http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~buie/pluto/mapstory.html. Retrieved February 10, 2010.
- ^ Buie, Marc W.; Grundy, William M.; Young, Eliot F.; Young, Leslie A.; Stern, S. Alan (2010). “Pluto and Charon with the Hubble Space Telescope: I. Monitoring global change and improved surface propertices from light curves”. Astronomical Journal 139 (3): 1117–1127. Bibcode 2010AJ….139.1117B. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/1117. http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~buie/biblio/pub072.html.
- ^ a b c d “New Hubble Maps of Pluto Show Surface Changes”. News Release Number: STScI-2010-06. February 4, 2010. http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2010/06/full/. Retrieved February 10, 2010.
- ^ a b Tobias C. Owen, Ted L. Roush et al (1993). “Surface Ices and the Atmospheric Composition of Pluto”. Science 261 (5122): 745–748. Bibcode 1993Sci…261..745O. doi:10.1126/science.261.5122.745. PMID 17757212.
- ^ Boyle, Alan (1999-02-11). “Pluto regains its place on the fringe”. MSNBC. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3077880/. Retrieved 2007-03-20.
- ^ a b c Hussmann, H.; Sohl, Frank; Spohn, Tilman (November 2006). “Subsurface oceans and deep interiors of medium-sized outer planet satellites and large trans-neptunian objects”. Icarus 185 (1): 258–273. Bibcode 2006Icar..185..258H. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.06.005.
- ^ “Pluto”. SolStation. 2006. http://www.solstation.com/stars/pluto.htm. Retrieved 2007-03-28.
- ^ “The Inside Story”. pluto.jhuapl.edu — NASA New Horizons mission site. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. 2007. http://www.pluto.jhuapl.edu/science/everything_pluto/9_insideStory.html. Retrieved 2007-03-29. [dead link]
- ^ DLR Interior Structure of Planetary Bodies DLR Radius to Density The natural satellites of the giant outer planets…
- ^ Davies, J. (2001). “Beyond Pluto (extract)”. Royal Observatory, Edinburgh. http://assets.cambridge.org/052180/0196/excerpt/0521800196_excerpt.pdf. Retrieved 2007-03-26.
- ^ Close, Laird M.; Merline, William J.; Tholen, David J.; Owen, Tobias C.; Roddier, Francois J.; Dumas, C. (2000). “Adaptive optics imaging of Pluto–Charon and the discovery of a moon around the Asteroid 45 Eugenia: the potential of adaptive optics in planetary astronomy”. Proceedings of the International Society for Optical Engineering 4007: 787–795. Bibcode 2000SPIE.4007..787C.
- ^ Millis, R. L. (1993). “Pluto’s radius and atmosphere – Results from the entire 9 June 1988 occultation data set”. Icarus 105 (2): 282. Bibcode 1993Icar..105..282M. doi:10.1006/icar.1993.1126.
- ^ a b c d e f Brown, Mike (2010-11-22). “How big is Pluto, anyway?”. Mike Brown’s Planets. http://www.mikebrownsplanets.com/2010/11/how-big-is-pluto-anyway.html. Retrieved 2010-11-23. (Franck Marchis on 2010-11-08)
- ^ Young, Eliot F.; Binzel, Richard P. (1994). “A new determination of radii and limb parameters for Pluto and Charon from mutual event lightcurves”. Icarus 108 (2): 219–224. Bibcode 1994Icar..108..219Y. doi:10.1006/icar.1994.1056.
- ^ Croswell, Ken (1992). “Nitrogen in Pluto’s Atmosphere”. http://www.kencroswell.com/NitrogenInPlutosAtmosphere.html. Retrieved 2007-04-27.
- ^ Lellouch, E.; Sicardy, B.; de Bergh, C.; Käufl, H. -U.; Kassi, S.; Campargue, A. (2009). “Pluto’s lower atmosphere structure and methane abundance from high-resolution spectroscopy and stellar occultations”. Astronomy and Astrophysics 495 (3): L17–L21. arXiv:0901.4882. Bibcode 2009A&A…495L..17L. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911633.
- ^ Than, Ker (2006). “Astronomers: Pluto colder than expected”. Space.com (via CNN.com). http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/space/01/03/pluto.temp/index.html. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
- ^ a b E. Lellouch, B. Sicardy, C. de Bergh (2009). “Pluto’s lower atmosphere structure and methane abundance from high-resolution spectroscopy and stellar occultations” (in press). Astronomy & Astrophysics.
- ^ a b Marsden, Brian G. (1985-08-26). “Occultation by Pluto on 1985 August 19″. IAU Circular 4097. http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/iauc/04000/04097.html#Item2. Retrieved 2011-11-26.
- ^ “NOFS Contributes to SOFIA’S Successful Observation of Challenging Pluto Occultation”. US Naval Observatory. http://www.usno.navy.mil/USNO/tours-events/NOFS_SOFIA_Release_110711.pdf. Retrieved 2012-02-11.
- ^ Johnston, R. (2006). “The atmospheres of Pluto and other trans-Neptunian objects”. http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/pluto.html. Retrieved 2007-03-26.
- ^ B. Sicardy et al (2003-07-10). “Large changes in Pluto’s atmosphere as revealed by recent stellar occultations”. Nature (Nature) 424 (6945): 168–70. doi:10.1038/nature01766. PMID 12853950.
- ^ “Pluto is undergoing global warming, researchers find”. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2002-10-09. http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2002/pluto.html. Retrieved 2007-03-20.
- ^ “Williams Scientists Contribute to New Finding About Pluto”. Williams College. 2003-07-09. http://www.williams.edu/admin/news/releases.php?id=162. Retrieved 2007-03-20.
- ^ a b R. R. Britt (2003). “Puzzling Seasons and Signs of Wind Found on Pluto”. Space.com. http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/pluto_seasons_030709.html. Retrieved 2007-03-26. [dead link]
- ^ Elliot, J. L. et al (2006). “The Size of Pluto’s Atmosphere As Revealed by the 2006 June 12 Occultation”. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society 38: 541. Bibcode 2006DPS….38.3102E.
- ^ Stern, Alan (November 1, 2006). “Making Old Horizons New”. The PI’s Perspective. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/overview/piPerspectives/piPerspective_11_1_2006.php. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ Guy Gugliotta. “Possible New Moons for Pluto.” Washington Post. November 1, 2005. Retrieved on October 10, 2006.
- ^ a b c “NASA’s Hubble Discovers Another Moon Around Pluto”. NASA. July 20, 2011. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/pluto-moon.html. Retrieved 2011-07-20.
- ^ S.A. Stern et al (2006). “Characteristics and Origin of the Quadruple System at Pluto”. Nature 439 (7079): 946–948. arXiv:astro-ph/0512599. Bibcode 2006Natur.439..946S. doi:10.1038/nature04548. PMID 16495992.
- ^ a b c Andrew J. Steffl; S. Alan Stern (2007 required). “First Constraints on Rings in the Pluto System”. The Astronomical Journal 133 (4): 1485–1489. arXiv:astro-ph/0608036. Bibcode 2007AJ….133.1485S. doi:10.1086/511770.
- ^ Richardson, Derek C.; Walsh, Kevin J. (2005). “Binary Minor Planets”. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 34 (1): 47–81. Bibcode 2006AREPS..34…47R. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120208.
- ^ B. Sicardy et al (2006). “Charon’s size and an upper limit on its atmosphere from a stellar occultation”. Nature 439 (7072): 52–4. Bibcode 2006Natur.439…52S. doi:10.1038/nature04351. PMID 16397493.
- ^ Young, Leslie (1997). “The Once and Future Pluto”. Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado. http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~layoung/projects/talks03/IfA-jan03v1.ppt. Retrieved 2007-03-26.
- ^ “Charon: An ice machine in the ultimate deep freeze”. Gemini Observatory News Release. 2007. http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0707/17charon/. Retrieved 2007-07-18.
- ^ Green, Daniel W. E (2006-06-21). “Satellites of Pluto”. IAU Circular 8723. http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/iauc/08700/08723.html#Item1. Retrieved 2011-11-26.
- ^ H. A. Weaver et al (2006). “Discovery of two new satellites of Pluto”. Nature 439 (7079): 943–945. arXiv:astro-ph/0601018. Bibcode 2006Natur.439..943W. doi:10.1038/nature04547. PMID 16495991.
- ^ Pasachoff, Babcock et al (2006). “A Search for Rings, Moons, or Debris in the Pluto System during the 2006 July 12 Occultation”. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 38 (3): 523. Bibcode 2006DPS….38.2502P.
- ^ A.J. Steffl; M.J. Mutchler, H.A. Weaver, S.A.Stern, D.D. Durda, D. Terrell, W.J. Merline, L.A. Young, E.F. Young, M.W. Buie, J.R. Spencer (2006). “New Constraints on Additional Satellites of the Pluto System”. The Astronomical Journal 132 (2): 614–619. arXiv:astro-ph/0511837. Bibcode 2006AJ….132..614S. doi:10.1086/505424. http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1538-3881/132/2/614/205104.html.
- ^ Ward, William R.; Canup, Robin M. (2006). “Forced Resonant Migration of Pluto’s Outer Satellites by Charon”. Science 313 (5790): 1107–1109. Bibcode 2006Sci…313.1107W. doi:10.1126/science.1127293. PMID 16825533.
- ^ Lakdawalla, E. (2011-07-20). “A fourth moon for Pluto”. Planetary Society weblog. The Planetary Society. http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00003107/. Retrieved 2011-07-20.
- ^ “Pluto’s Orbit”. pluto.jhuapl.edu — NASA New Horizons mission site. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. 2007. http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/science/everything_pluto/16_plutoOrbit.html. Retrieved 2007-03-26. [dead link]
- ^ “Colossal Cousin to a Comet?”. pluto.jhuapl.edu — NASA New Horizons mission site. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/science/everything_pluto/8_cousin.html. Retrieved 2006-06-23. [dead link]
- ^ Tyson, Neil deGrasse (1999). “Pluto Is Not a Planet”. The Planetary Society. http://www.planetary.org/explore/topics/topten/tyson_pluto_is_not.html. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
- ^ “Neptune’s Moon Triton”. The Planetary Society. http://www.planetary.org/explore/topics/neptune/triton.html. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
- ^ Jewitt, David (2004). “The Plutinos”. University of Hawaii. Archived from the original on April 19, 2007. http://web.archive.org/web/20070419234021/http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~jewitt/kb/plutino.html. Retrieved 2007-03-26.
- ^ Hahn, Joseph M. (2005). “Neptune’s Migration into a Stirred–Up Kuiper Belt: A Detailed Comparison of Simulations to Observations”. Saint Mary’s University. http://gemelli.colorado.edu/~hahnjm/pubs/migrate.pdf. Retrieved 2008-03-05.
- ^ a b Harold F. Levison et al (2007). “Origin of the Structure of the Kuiper Belt during a Dynamical Instability in the Orbits of Uranus and Neptune”. Icarus 196 (1): 258. arXiv:0712.0553. Bibcode 2008Icar..196..258L. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.11.035.
- ^ R. Malhotra (1995). “The Origin of Pluto’s Orbit: Implications for the Solar System Beyond Neptune”. Astronomical Journal 110: 420. arXiv:astro-ph/9504036. Bibcode 1995AJ….110..420M. doi:10.1086/117532.
- ^ “Voyager Frequently Asked Questions”. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. January 14, 2003. http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/faq.html. Retrieved 2006-09-08.
- ^ Dava Sobel (1993). “The last world”. Discover magazine. http://discovermagazine.com/1993/may/thelastworld215. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
- ^ Williams, Dr. David R. (2005). “Pluto Kuiper Express”. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraftDisplay.do?id=PLUTOKE. Retrieved 2007-03-26.
- ^ Britt, Robert Roy (2003). “Pluto Mission a Go! Initial Funding Secured”. space.com. http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/pluto_horizons_030225.html. Retrieved 2007-04-13. [dead link]
- ^ Stern, Dr. Alan (2006). “Happy 100th Birthday, Clyde Tombaugh”. Southwest Research Institute. http://www.jhuapl.edu/newscenter/pressreleases/2006/060203.asp. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
- ^ “New Horizons, Not Quite to Jupiter, Makes First Pluto Sighting”. pluto.jhuapl.edu — NASA New Horizons mission site. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. 2006-11-28. http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/news_center/news/112806.php. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ a b c “Powell, et al., ”Pluto Orbiter/lander/sample return missions using the MITEE nuclear engine” (2003) ISBN 0-7803-7651-X”. Ieeexplore.ieee.org. 2004-08-02. doi:10.1109/AERO.2003.1235077. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1235077. Retrieved 2011-11-22.
- ^ Tyson, Neil deGrasse (February 2, 2001). “Astronomer Responds to Pluto-Not-a-Planet Claim”. Space.com. http://www.space.com/1925-astronomer-responds-pluto-planet-claim.html. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
- ^ Brown, Michael E.; Trujillo, Chadwick A. (2004). “Direct Measurement of the Size of the Large Kuiper Belt Object (50000) Quaoar”. The Astronomical Journal 127 (4): 2413–2417. Bibcode 2004AJ….127.2413B. doi:10.1086/382513.
- ^ Grundy, W. M.; Noll, K. S.; Stephens, D. C. (2005). “Diverse Albedos of Small Trans-Neptunian Objects”. Icarus 176: 184. arXiv:astro-ph/0502229. Bibcode 2005Icar..176..184G. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.01.007.
- ^ Stansberry, J. et al (2007). “Physical Properties of Kuiper Belt and Centaur Objects: Constraints from Spitzer Space Telescope”. The Solar System Beyond Neptune: 161. arXiv:astro-ph/0702538v2. Bibcode 2008ssbn.book..161S.
- ^ “NASA-Funded Scientists Discover Tenth Planet”. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. 2005-07-29. http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news-print.cfm?release=2005-126. Retrieved 2007-02-22.
- ^ a b Steven Soter (2007). “What is a Planet?”. The Astronomical Journal 132 (6): 2513. arXiv:astro-ph/0608359. Bibcode 2006AJ….132.2513S. doi:10.1086/508861. http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&articleID=93385350-E7F2-99DF-3FD6272BB4959038&pageNumber=2&catID=2.
- ^ “IAU 2006 General Assembly: Resolutions 5 and 6″. IAU. August 24, 2006. http://www.iau.org/static/resolutions/Resolution_GA26-5-6.pdf.
- ^ a b “IAU 2006 General Assembly: Result of the IAU Resolution votes”. International Astronomical Union (News Release—IAU0603). 24 August 2006. http://www.iau.org/public_press/news/detail/iau0603/. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
- ^ a b “Plutoid chosen as name for Solar System objects like Pluto”. International Astronomical Union (News Release—IAU0804). June 11, 2008, Paris. http://www.iau.org/public_press/news/release/iau0804. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- ^ Green, Daniel W. E. (2006-09-13). “(134340) Pluto, (136199) Eris, and (136199) Eris I (Dysnomia)”. IAU Circular 8747. Archived from the original on February 5, 2007. http://web.archive.org/web/20070205035336/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/special/08747.pdf. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- ^ Robert Roy Britt (August 24, 2006). “Pluto Demoted: No Longer a Planet in Highly Controversial Definition”. Space.com. http://space.com/scienceastronomy/060824_planet_definition.html. Retrieved 2006-09-08.
- ^ Sal Ruibal (January 6, 1999). “Astronomers question if Pluto is real planet”. USA Today.
- ^ Robert Roy Britt (November 21, 2006). “Why Planets Will Never Be Defined”. Space.com. http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/061121_exoplanet_definition.html. Retrieved 2006-12-01.
- ^ Robert Roy Britt (August 24, 2006). “Scientists decide Pluto’s no longer a planet”. MSNBC. http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14489259/. Retrieved 2006-09-08.
- ^ a b David Shiga (August 25, 2006). “New planet definition sparks furore”. NewScientist.com. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9846-new-planet-definition-sparks-furore.html. Retrieved 2006-09-08. [dead link]
- ^ Buie, Marc W. (September 2006). “My response to 2006 IAU Resolutions 5a and 6a”. Southwest Research Institute. Archived from the original on June 3, 2007. http://web.archive.org/web/20070603104622/http://www.lowell.edu/users/buie/pluto/iauresponse.html. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- ^ Overbye, Dennis (2006-08-24). “Pluto Is Demoted to ‘Dwarf Planet’”. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/24/science/space/25pluto.html. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- ^ Minkel, JR (April 10, 2008). “Is Rekindling the Pluto Planet Debate a Good Idea?”. Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rekindling-the-pluto-planet-debate. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- ^ “The Great Planet Debate: Science as Process. A Scientific Conference and Educator Workshop”. gpd.jhuapl.edu. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. 2008-06-27. http://gpd.jhuapl.edu/. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- ^ Planetary Science Institute press release on September 19, 2008 “Scientists Debate Planet Definition and Agree to Disagree” PSI.edu
- ^ Discover Magazine, January 2009, p. 76. “Plutoids Join the Solar Family”
- ^ Science News, July 5, 2008 p. 7
- ^ DeVore, Edna (September 7, 2006). “Planetary Politics: Protecting Pluto”. Space.com. http://www.space.com/2855-planetary-politics-protecting-pluto.html. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- ^ Holden, C. (23 March 2007). “Rehabilitating Pluto”. Science 315 (5819): 1643. doi:10.1126/science.315.5819.1643c.
- ^ Gutierrez, Joni Marie (2007). “A joint memorial. Declaring Pluto a planet and declaring March 13, 2007, ‘Pluto planet day’ at the legislature”. Legislature of New Mexico. http://legis.state.nm.us/Sessions/07%20Regular/memorials/house/HJM054.html. Retrieved 2009-09-05.
- ^ “Illinois General Assembly: Bill Status of SR0046, 96th General Assembly”. ilga.gov. Illinois General Assembly. http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=46&GAID=10&DocTypeID=SR&LegId=40752&SessionID=76&GA=96. Retrieved 2011-03-16.
- ^ “Pluto’s still the same Pluto”. Independent Newspapers. Associated Press. October 21, 2006. http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=31&art_id=qw1161415265563B221. Retrieved 2011-11-29. “Mickey Mouse has a cute dog.”
- Croswell, Ken (1997). Planet Quest: The Epic Discovery of Alien Solar Systems. New York: The Free Press. ISBN 978-0-684-83252-4.
Media related to Pluto at Wikimedia Commons
|Find more about Pluto on Wikipedia’s sister projects:|
|Definitions and translations from Wiktionary|
|Images and media from Commons|
|Learning resources from Wikiversity|
|News stories from Wikinews|
|Quotations from Wikiquote|
|Source texts from Wikisource|
|Textbooks from Wikibooks|
- Pluto Profile at NASA’s Solar System Exploration site
- NASA Pluto factsheet
- Website of the observatory that discovered Pluto